
謙聖國際法律事務所-專精詐欺、毒品刑事辯護及侵害配偶權律師
店家商品
Providing your phone number to another person does not automatically constitute fraud in Taiwan. Allowing family members or coworkers to use a phone number for legitimate purposes is generally different from supplying SIM cards to strangers who may use them for criminal activities.
➡︎ However, if a SIM card registered under your name is used to contact fraud victims, fraudulent accounts, impersonate banks or government agencies, or receive verification codes, police may investigate whether you aided fraud or participated in a criminal scheme.
The key legal question is not simply whose name appears on the mobile phone contract, but whether the provider knew or foresaw that the phone number could be used for fraud and nevertheless assisted the criminal activity.
Relevant factors include why the SIM card was provided, whether payment was received, how many phone numbers were registered, whether verification codes were shared, and how the number was actually used.
Someone who was deceived into providing a SIM card through a fake job offer, loan application, or telecommunications promotion is not automatically guilty. Nevertheless, preserving evidence and explaining the circumstances of the transfer are essential.
1. Fraud and Aiding Fraud Under Taiwan's Criminal Code
Article 339 of Taiwan's Criminal Code governs ordinary fraud, including obtaining another person's property through deception with the intent to obtain unlawful benefits.
➡︎ A person who merely provides a phone number is usually not the individual directly deceiving the victim. However, Article 30 of the Criminal Code provides for criminal liability where a person intentionally assists another person in committing a crime.
➡︎ An aider may receive a reduced sentence compared with the principal offender, depending on the applicable legal requirements.
Therefore, someone who supplies a SIM card may face aiding fraud allegations even without personally contacting victims or receiving stolen money.
2. Criminal Intent Must Still Be Proven
➡︎ The fact that a SIM card was used in a scam does not automatically prove that its registered owner committed aiding fraud.
Under Article 13, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, conditional intent may exist where a person foresees that a criminal result could occur and accepts that possibility.
Prosecutors must therefore examine whether the provider knew or foresaw the potential criminal use of the SIM card and nevertheless provided assistance.
➡︎ The registered ownership of a phone number is an investigative starting point, not conclusive evidence of guilt.
1. Sharing a Number Is Different from Giving Someone Control of a SIM Card
Simply telling another person your mobile number does not necessarily give that person control over your telecommunications services.
➡︎ By contrast, transferring a physical SIM card may allow the recipient to make calls, send messages, receive one-time verification codes, and register online accounts.
Providing the SIM card together with a mobile phone, identity documents, account credentials, or verification codes may additional risks because the recipient can potentially impersonate the registered subscriber.
Investigators may pay particular attention to cases involving multiple newly registered phone numbers, unexplained payments, unknown recipients, or repeated requests for verification codes.
2. Can Family Members or Coworkers Legally Use Your Phone Number?
Article 16 of Taiwan's Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act and Article 14 of the Regulations Governing the Use of Subscriber Numbers by Telecommunications Enterprises address the transfer of telecommunications services and subscriber identity verification.
Certain uses for personal family life or internal business activities are treated differently from ordinary transfers requiring renewed subscriber verification and registration.
➡︎ However, these exceptions do not provide blanket immunity from criminal liability.
If someone knowingly provides a SIM card to assist fraudulent activity, the existence of a family or employment relationship does not automatically eliminate criminal responsibility.
Conversely, ordinary family use without knowledge of criminal activity does not establish aiding fraud merely because the number is later misused.
A fraudulent or nominee SIM card generally refers to a phone number registered under one person's identity but controlled or used by another.
Fraud groups may use such numbers to conceal their identities, contact victims, register messaging applications, or receive verification codes for online services.
Common recruitment schemes include fake job opportunities, loan assistance, telecommunications subsidies, and offers to exchange newly registered phone numbers for cash.
Taiwan's High Prosecutors Office has publicly warned that registering phone numbers for cash may expose subscribers to telecommunications charges, contractual penalties, and criminal investigations if the SIM cards are later used for fraud or other illegal activities.
➡︎ The fact that a person registered the number does not automatically prove criminal participation, but it may lead investigators to contact that person.
1. Ordinary Fraud and Aggravated Fraud
Where a phone number is used to deceive victims into transferring money, the underlying offense may involve ordinary fraud under Article 339 of the Criminal Code.
Article 339-4 addresses aggravated fraud involving circumstances such as three or more participants, impersonation of government authorities or public officials, or certain forms of fraudulent communications disseminated to the public.
A SIM card provider may be investigated for aiding the relevant offense if the required elements of assistance and criminal intent are established.
➡︎ However, liability for aiding aggravated fraud requires an assessment of the provider's knowledge, conduct, and relationship to the aggravating circumstances.
2. Aiding Fraud Is Different from Jointly Committing Fraud
Providing a SIM card does not automatically make someone a principal member of a fraud organization.
Investigators should distinguish between a person who merely supplied a telecommunications tool and someone who actively recruited SIM card holders, coordinated fraudulent communications, collected verification codes, or participated in receiving criminal proceeds.
➡︎ The extent of actual participation may affect whether the conduct is treated as aiding an offense or more direct criminal involvement.
1. Circumstances That May Support an Inference of Criminal Intent
Prosecutors may examine whether the provider received unusually high compensation for registering phone numbers, transferred multiple SIM cards to strangers, or failed to obtain any reasonable explanation of their intended use.
Requests for identity documents, mobile devices, verification codes, or secrecy may also be relevant.
Continuing to provide SIM cards after receiving warnings about possible fraud may strengthen an allegation that the provider understood and accepted the criminal risk.
➡︎ However, these circumstances must be evaluated collectively. No single suspicious factor automatically establishes criminal intent.
2. When Can a Provider Argue That They Were Deceived?
A person who provided a SIM card because of a seemingly legitimate job, loan, family request, or telecommunications arrangement may argue that they lacked the intent to assist fraud.
The defense should examine the representations made by the recipient, the provider's understanding at the time, the payment arrangement, and any subsequent efforts to stop misuse.
Relevant evidence may include job advertisements, loan documents, messages, delivery records, payment histories, and communications with the telecommunications provider.
➡︎ If a SIM card was stolen, lost, or registered through identity theft, the person should promptly report the circumstances and preserve supporting records.False claims of theft or identity misuse should never be fabricated as a defense.
Providing a phone number or SIM card does not automatically constitute money laundering merely because the number was later used to contact fraud victims.
Money laundering allegations generally require examination of conduct involving criminal proceeds, such as transferring, receiving, concealing, disguising, or possessing relevant assets under the applicable statutory provisions.
➡︎ However, additional criminal exposure may arise if the SIM card provider also transfers bank account credentials, ATM cards, online banking access, electronic payment accounts, or financial verification codes.
A person who later assists with receiving or transferring fraudulent payments may face allegations extending beyond the original SIM card arrangement.
➡︎ Therefore, the defense must examine the full scope of the person's involvement rather than focusing solely on whether the individual personally received stolen money.
Articles 16 to 18 of Taiwan's Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act establish relevant telecommunications verification and anti-fraud requirements.
Where telecommunications services are transferred without the required subscriber verification or registration, or where authorities identify suspected fraudulent use, telecommunications providers may be required to restrict or suspend services under the applicable conditions.
A suspended phone number does not mean that a criminal court has found the registered subscriber guilty.
➡︎ If service is suspended, the subscriber should contact the telecommunications company to confirm the reason, determine whether renewed identity verification is required, and preserve all notices and customer service records.
1. Contact the Telecommunications Provider Immediately
➡︎ If a SIM card remains in another person's possession or may be used without authorization, contact the telecommunications provider to discuss suspension, replacement, termination, or subscriber verification.
Ask whether the existing service agreement remains active and whether additional charges or contractual obligations may apply.
2. Preserve Original Evidence
Keep the telecommunications contract, subscriber registration records, messages, emails, advertisements, delivery information, and any payment records.
➡︎ Preserve the original conversations rather than relying only on screenshots.
➡︎ Prepare a chronological record showing when the number was registered, when the SIM card was transferred, when any payment was received, when suspicious activity was discovered, and what corrective actions followed.
3. Secure Accounts Linked to the Phone Number
Review banking services, electronic payment accounts, social media, messaging applications, and email accounts connected to the affected number.
Where necessary, change passwords, remove unauthorized devices, and update two-factor authentication settings.
➡︎ If fraud or identity misuse is suspected, consider contacting the police or Taiwan's 165 Anti-Fraud Hotline.
1. Rights During Police Questioning
➡︎ If police contact you because a SIM card registered under your name was used in a suspected fraud case, first confirm the investigating authority, case details, and whether you are being questioned as a witness or suspect.
Under Taiwan's Code of Criminal Procedure, criminal suspects have rights including the right to remain silent, the right to retain defense counsel, and the right to request investigation of favorable evidence.
Legal counsel may assist with preparing for questioning and reviewing the evidence. Defense counsel may generally attend questioning, take notes, and express opinions, subject to applicable statutory limitations.
Statements should be limited to facts personally known or reliably recalled. Do not guess, invent explanations, delete records, or coordinate false accounts with others.
2. Five Important Defense Questions
■ The first question is whether the provider knew or foresaw that the SIM card would be used for fraud.
■ The second is whether the provision of the SIM card actually assisted the fraudulent activity.
■ The third concerns when the number was used. For example, an official Pingtung District Court criminal compensation decision discussed a case in which a phone number was used to arrange transportation only after the fraud had been completed. The timing and function of that use were important to the legal assessment of aiding fraud.
■ The fourth question is whether the provider merely transferred a SIM card or participated in additional activities such as recruitment, verification, account management, or financial transactions.
■ The fifth is whether the provider took prompt and documented action after discovering the misuse.
These issues help distinguish an innocent subscriber, a deceived provider, an aider, and a person who participated more directly in criminal conduct.
1. Why Registering SIM Cards for Cash Is High Risk
Offers to pay cash in exchange for newly registered SIM cards may several forms of exposure.
➡︎ The registered subscriber may remain responsible for telecommunications fees and contractual penalties.
➡︎ The SIM cards may also be transferred to criminal groups, resulting in police investigations.
Where evidence shows that the provider knew or accepted the possibility that the numbers would be used for fraud, criminal liability for aiding fraud may arise.
Registering multiple numbers, collecting verification codes, or coordinating SIM card transfers may increase the seriousness of the allegations.
The absence of actual profit does not automatically establish the absence of criminal intent.
2. What If You Receive a Notice from Taiwan's Investigation Bureau?
A notice from the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau may indicate that the SIM card is relevant to a broader investigation involving financial transactions, organized activity, corporate records, or cross-border offenses.Depending on the facts, the investigation may involve fraud, money laundering, banking offenses, organized crime, or other criminal laws.
Before questioning, the recipient should confirm their procedural status and organize relevant telecommunications, communication, and financial records.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm assists clients in criminal investigations involving police authorities, the Investigation Bureau, and prosecutors' offices.
Where a person is investigated for providing phone numbers, SIM cards, or verification codes, early legal review may help clarify the evidence, the person's actual role, and the appropriate defense strategy.
Q1: Can I be charged with fraud if I lend my SIM card to someone in Taiwan?
Possibly, but providing a SIM card does not automatically establish fraud. Criminal liability depends on the person's conduct, intent, and connection to the underlying offense.
Q2: Is it illegal to let a family member use my phone number?
Legitimate family use is generally treated differently from transferring a SIM card to an unknown third party. However, knowingly assisting fraud may still criminal liability.
Q3: Can I be charged with aiding fraud if I never received the victim's money?
Yes. Personally receiving criminal proceeds is not always required for aiding fraud. The relevant issues include intentional assistance and the underlying criminal activity.
Q4: What if I was tricked into providing my SIM card through a job advertisement?
The circumstances may support a defense based on the absence of criminal intent. Preserve the advertisement, messages, payment records, and evidence explaining why you believed the arrangement was legitimate.
Q5: Does providing a SIM card automatically constitute money laundering?
No. Money laundering liability requires separate analysis of the applicable statutory elements and any involvement with criminal proceeds or financial transactions.
Q6: What should I do if a fraud group is using my phone number?
Contact your telecommunications provider, preserve the evidence, secure accounts linked to the number, and consider reporting the suspected misuse to the police or the 165 Anti-Fraud Hotline.
Q7: Can I seek non-prosecution in a SIM card fraud case?
Non-prosecution may be possible where the evidence is insufficient to establish the required criminal elements, including the defendant's intent to assist fraud. The outcome depends on the complete case record.
Providing a mobile phone number or SIM card to another person does not automatically make the registered subscriber guilty of fraud under Taiwanese law.
The central issues are whether the provider knew or foresaw the criminal purpose, whether the conduct intentionally assisted fraud, and how the SIM card was actually used.
Nevertheless, transferring SIM cards, verification codes, mobile devices, or multiple phone numbers to strangers—especially in exchange for suspicious payments—may serious legal risks.
➠ If a SIM card has been misused, promptly contact the telecommunications provider, preserve all communications and transaction records, and secure any linked online accounts.
➠ If you receive a police, Investigation Bureau, or prosecutors' office notice, seek legal advice before questioning when appropriate.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm assists individuals facing allegations involving aiding fraud, aggravated fraud, money laundering, and related criminal investigations.
A careful examination of the evidence can help determine whether the person was deceived, merely provided telecommunications services, or knowingly assisted criminal activity.
※ This article provides general legal information and does not replace individualized advice from a qualified lawyer. Criminal liability depends on the specific facts, evidence, and applicable law.
This reduces both medical risks and potential legal exposure.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm![]()
LINE Online Legal Consultation: @lawuicc001 (Click to consult)
Welcome to call to schedule a meeting: 03-3150-034
Multiple payment methods available: Cash, Credit Card, Bank Transfer
Facebook: Chien Sheng International Law Firm
Instagram: chien.sheng_
其它相關店家資訊