
謙聖國際法律事務所-專精詐欺、毒品刑事辯護及侵害配偶權律師
店家商品
Receiving a police notice, prosecutor's summons, court summons, or Investigation Bureau notification concerning money laundering can be alarming, especially when you believe you have never knowingly participated in a financial crime.
In Taiwan, money laundering investigations may involve bank account providers, ATM withdrawal agents, cash collection agents, cryptocurrency traders, third-party payment services, and cross-border financial transactions.
Two principles are essential: receiving a summons does not mean you have been found guilty, but ignoring an official notice, deleting evidence, or answering questions without preparation may additional legal risks.
This guide explains Taiwan's Money Laundering Control Act, the criminal investigation process, potential penalties, and defense strategies for individuals accused of money laundering or related fraud offenses.
Police officers may issue written notices requiring criminal suspects to appear for questioning.
Under Article 71-1 of Taiwan's Code of Criminal Procedure, a suspect who fails to appear without a legitimate reason after receiving a lawful notice may face further compulsory procedures, including an arrest warrant issued by a prosecutor upon application.
A police notice is not necessarily the same as a formal court summons, but it should not be ignored.Before attending, verify the issuing authority, case number, alleged offense, procedural status, date, and location.
A summons issued by a district prosecutors office generally indicates that a case is under prosecutorial investigation.
The prosecutor may investigate how bank accounts were opened or transferred, the movement of funds, cash withdrawals, cryptocurrency transactions, compensation, and communications with other individuals.
➡︎ Statements made during an investigation may become important evidence in subsequent proceedings.Suspects should understand their rights and consider consulting a criminal defense lawyer before questioning.
A court summons may indicate that criminal charges have been filed and the case has entered judicial proceedings.The allegations may involve money laundering, aiding money laundering, unlawful account provision, fraud, or other related offenses.
Under Article 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty through a final judgment.A criminal indictment is not equivalent to a conviction.
Taiwan's Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau may investigate complex financial crimes involving cryptocurrency, offshore transfers, illegal fundraising, corporate accounts, or organized fraud.These investigations may involve extensive financial records, digital evidence, and statements from multiple suspects.
Before attending an interview, determine whether you are being questioned as a witness, a person connected to the case, or a criminal suspect.Where criminal liability is possible, early legal assistance is particularly important.
Confirm the issuing authority, case number, contact details, and required appearance date.
Beware of impersonation scams. Legitimate judicial authorities do not instruct individuals to transfer money into supposed safe accounts or pay private deposits to clear criminal allegations.Use independently verified official contact information when checking a suspicious notice.
Money laundering allegations may involve concealing criminal proceeds, obstructing asset tracing, receiving or using proceeds from specified unlawful activities, or transferring funds through bank accounts and virtual asset platforms.
A separate allegation may concern providing financial accounts without a legitimate reason.The first defense question is therefore not simply whether money passed through an account, but which specific statutory offense the prosecution alleges.
Relevant evidence may include bank statements, ATM withdrawal records, online banking logs, cryptocurrency exchange records, blockchain transaction identifiers, wallet addresses, job advertisements, loan applications, messaging histories, and police reports.Preserve complete conversations rather than selectively retaining favorable screenshots.
The surrounding context may explain why an account was provided, what instructions were received, and what the individual understood at the time.
➡︎ If an account contains money potentially connected to an investigation, do not independently withdraw, redistribute, or transfer the funds.
Under Article 18 of the Money Laundering Control Act, prosecutors may seek judicial orders restricting certain transactions involving suspected money laundering property when statutory conditions are satisfied.
A restricted account does not itself establish guilt, but unauthorized transactions may complicate the investigation.
Avoid asking other suspects, intermediaries, account holders, or witnesses to delete messages or change their statements.
Such conduct may concerns about evidence destruction or collusion and increase the risk of compulsory measures.
Document when each account was opened, who used it, when access was provided, why it was provided, whether compensation was received, and how funds moved.
➡︎ If multiple accounts or cryptocurrency wallets are involved, distinguish each account and transaction separately.
A clear timeline helps identify inconsistencies and supports a more accurate reconstruction of events.
Money laundering investigations may overlap with fraud, aggravated fraud, organized crime, illegal fundraising, or Banking Act violations.
Because these offenses have different legal elements and penalties, legal advice should address the complete factual and financial background rather than a single isolated transaction.
Article 2 of Taiwan's Money Laundering Control Act defines money laundering to include certain conduct involving the concealment, receipt, possession, use, or handling of proceeds from specified unlawful activities.
Under Article 19, the general statutory penalty is imprisonment of three to ten years, together with a fine of up to NT$100 million.
Where the value of the laundered property or property interests is below NT$100 million, the statutory penalty is imprisonment of six months to five years, together with a fine of up to NT$50 million.Attempts are also punishable.
➡︎ However, the existence of a bank transfer does not automatically establish money laundering.The prosecution must prove the applicable elements of the alleged offense, including the connection to specified unlawful activity and the defendant's legally relevant knowledge or intent.
Article 20 addresses specified circumstances involving property without a reasonable explanation of its origin.These include certain situations involving accounts opened under false identities, improperly obtained accounts, or circumvention of anti-money laundering procedures.The statutory penalty may include imprisonment of six months to five years and a fine of up to NT$50 million.
Article 20 should not be confused with Article 19 or the separate account-provision restrictions under Article 22.
Article 22 generally restricts the delivery or provision of bank accounts and certain virtual asset or third-party payment accounts to other persons.
Exceptions may apply where the arrangement is consistent with ordinary business or financial practices, is based on trust between friends or relatives, or has another legitimate justification.
Certain violations may result in a police warning.Criminal penalties may apply in specified circumstances, including providing accounts in exchange for agreed or received compensation, providing three or more accounts, or committing another violation within five years after a relevant warning.
➡︎ The statutory criminal penalty is imprisonment of up to three years, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of up to NT$1 million, or both imprisonment and a fine.
➡︎ The critical distinction is that an account warning, an account-provision offense, and general money laundering are not legally identical.Each requires an independent assessment of the relevant facts and statutory elements.
Many account-related investigations begin with online job offers, loan applications, investment arrangements, romantic relationships, or requests from acquaintances.
An individual may provide a bank account, ATM card, online banking credentials, or verification codes without realizing that another person intends to use the account to receive fraud proceeds.
When victims' money enters the account, investigators may examine whether the account holder knowingly assisted fraud or money laundering.
The defense should examine why the account was provided, what representations were made, whether suspicious instructions were received, and whether the account holder received compensation.
Other important questions include whether the individual retained control over the account, knew that victims were transferring money, or contacted the bank or police after discovering suspicious activity.
A statement such as "I was deceived" should be supported by available evidence.
At the same time, the fact that an account received fraud proceeds does not automatically prove that its holder knowingly participated in a crime.The central issue is whether the prosecution can establish the required criminal intent and conduct.
A money mule may be accused of withdrawing fraud proceeds from an ATM, collecting cash from victims, or delivering money to another participant.
Evidence may include surveillance footage, transaction records, mobile phone location data, communications, vehicle movements, and statements from other suspects.
Taiwanese Supreme Court jurisprudence recognizes that withdrawing identifiable fraud proceeds may constitute general money laundering when the required legal elements are established.
However, this does not mean every withdrawal automatically constitutes money laundering.
➡︎ The defense should examine whether surveillance footage reliably identifies the suspect, whether the transaction time and amount match the allegations, and what the suspect understood about the money's source.
➡︎ The investigation should also distinguish separate victims, transactions, and alleged criminal acts.
Other relevant issues include who issued the instructions, whether compensation was unusual, and whether statements from accomplices are reliable.
A person may face allegations of both fraud and money laundering, but the prosecution must still prove the applicable elements of each offense.
Cryptocurrency transactions may involve legitimate purchases, investment activity, customer payments, or asset transfers.
The fact that funds passed through a cryptocurrency exchange or wallet does not automatically establish criminal liability.
Investigators may examine the transaction's purpose, counterparties, pricing, payment methods, wallet addresses, and connections to suspected criminal proceeds.
Relevant records include exchange registration details, identity verification documents, transaction histories, customer communications, bank statements, wallet addresses, blockchain records, and platform risk notifications.
➡︎ For cryptocurrency dealers, these materials may help demonstrate whether transactions were commercially genuine and whether there was evidence of knowledge of criminal proceeds.Being a cryptocurrency trader does not provide automatic immunity.
Equally, receiving funds or exchanging cryptocurrency for another person does not, by itself, establish money laundering.The assessment depends on the transaction context, the applicable legal elements, and the available evidence.
Under Article 95 of Taiwan's Code of Criminal Procedure, defendants must be informed of their alleged offenses and relevant procedural rights, including the right to remain silent, the right to legal representation, and the right to request the investigation of favorable evidence.
➡︎ If you do not understand the allegations or cannot verify the details of a transaction, you may request legal assistance before answering substantive questions.Exercising the right to remain silent is not an admission of guilt.
2. Recording and Reviewing Interview Statements
Articles 100-1 and 100-2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure establish recording requirements applicable to relevant criminal questioning procedures.
During questioning, avoid guessing about unfamiliar transactions or accepting inaccurate assumptions.Review the written interview record carefully before signing.
Check the dates, account numbers, transaction amounts, identities, and sequence of events.
➡︎ If the record does not accurately reflect your statements, request corrections.Under Article 156, a confession alone cannot serve as the sole basis for a conviction without the necessary supporting evidence.
3. Consequences of Failing to Appear
Under Articles 71 and 75 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a defendant who fails to appear after lawful summons without a legitimate reason may be subject to compulsory appearance measures.
➡︎ If illness, an accident, or another legitimate circumstance prevents attendance, promptly contact the responsible authority and submit supporting documentation.
Believing that you are innocent is not a sufficient reason to ignore a lawful summons.
Depending on the evidence and procedural stage, a case may result in non-prosecution, deferred prosecution, acquittal, conviction on a lesser offense, sentencing mitigation, or a suspended sentence.
Other issues may involve confiscation of criminal proceeds, financial account restrictions, or the relationship between money laundering and fraud charges.
Article 23 of the Money Laundering Control Act provides specific mechanisms for sentence reduction or exemption in qualifying circumstances.
These may involve voluntary surrender, confession, surrender of illegal proceeds, or cooperation that results in the recovery of laundered assets or identification of other offenders, subject to the applicable statutory requirements.
A confession does not automatically guarantee a reduced sentence.Before making any admission, the defendant should understand the allegations, the evidence, and the legal consequences.
The version of the law applicable to the alleged conduct must also be considered.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm handles criminal cases involving money laundering, fraud, dummy accounts, flagged bank accounts, ATM withdrawal agents, cash collection agents, cryptocurrency transactions, third-party payment services, illegal fundraising, and cross-border financial activity.
With offices in Taipei, Taoyuan, and Kaohsiung, the firm provides criminal defense assistance across Taiwan.
In money laundering cases, legal analysis may focus on whether the alleged underlying crime occurred, whether the disputed funds were criminal proceeds, and whether the defendant had the required knowledge or intent.
The defense may also examine account-transfer circumstances, transaction records, communications, surveillance footage, digital evidence, and witness statements.
Different roles, such as account providers, cash withdrawal agents, cryptocurrency traders, and alleged organizers, should not be treated as legally interchangeable.
Where supported by the evidence, the firm may assess the possibility of non-prosecution, deferred prosecution, acquittal, reduced charges, sentencing mitigation, or other favorable outcomes.Published case results provide useful examples, but they do not guarantee the outcome of a new case.
No. A flagged or restricted bank account is not equivalent to a criminal conviction. Liability depends on the relevant conduct, the account holder's knowledge or intent, and the evidence.
Possibly, depending on the offense and facts. Compensation may be relevant, but it is not the only factor. The prosecution must establish the applicable legal elements.
If the money is proven to be proceeds of a specified unlawful activity and the relevant statutory elements are established, withdrawing or handling those funds may money laundering liability.
No. Article 23 contains specific requirements for sentence reduction or exemption. The timing and substance of the confession, treatment of illegal proceeds, and qualifying cooperation may be relevant.
No. Detention requires a separate judicial assessment under the applicable criminal procedure rules. Receiving an investigation notice alone does not establish that detention is necessary.
Money laundering cases in Taiwan often turn on more than whether money entered or left a bank account.
The origin of the funds, the defendant's understanding of the transactions, the purpose of the transfers, and the actual role played by each person may all be legally significant.
If you receive a money laundering summons, verify the notice, preserve relevant records, avoid transferring disputed funds, and do not coordinate statements or destroy evidence.
➡︎ Where a case involves bank accounts, money mules, cryptocurrency, third-party payment services, or Investigation Bureau questioning, early advice from a Taiwan criminal defense lawyer can help identify the relevant legal issues and prepare an appropriate response.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm provides legal assistance based on the alleged offenses, transaction history, available evidence, and procedural stage of each case.
※ Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information and does not constitute individualized legal advice. Laws and judicial interpretations may change. The applicable statutory provisions and potential criminal liability must be determined according to the facts, relevant dates, and evidence of each case.
This reduces both medical risks and potential legal exposure.
Chien Sheng International Law Firm![]()
LINE Online Legal Consultation: @lawuicc001 (Click to consult)
Welcome to call to schedule a meeting: 03-3150-034
Multiple payment methods available: Cash, Credit Card, Bank Transfer
Facebook: Chien Sheng International Law Firm
Instagram: chien.sheng_
其它相關店家資訊